-`._-`._-`._-`._-`._-`._-`._-`._-`._-`._-`._-`._-`._-`._-`._-`._-
``.~. r-. (*) -=~ .___ __. , ___ _ __
' ' / \ // `| R \\ / \\ /: ^ / / '. \\ \/ ====|
- | | ! || < :|. _ //.| 0 | /|: |*| | | A | || ||:
= \*/ + || / | =|\ |. 0 |. \ | : | | a || | V | >===
-= v \ || \==- | ^ |. \\ // \\/ \v/ \_ --, \'/ :
~-= |`. `" ~ `~ u ' V |__| V .====|
<- Back to 2008.02.17.
Prepar' for the most comprehensive review of in-ear monitors in
the world!
Audio sources:
* Apple iPod nano 2G
* Apple iPhone
* Edirol UA-1000 audio interface (headphone out)
Jays q-JAYS
the good
- Great form factor
- L/R well marked
the bad
- None of my audio sources seemed to drive them
properly
- Way too much treble, way too little bass
Shure SE530
the good
- Amazing response and clarity
- Selection of ear sleeves allows a proper fit
- iPod seems to drive them as well as the Edirol
the bad
- Harsh treble; a general problem of canalphones,
but more pronounced here
- Less bass than I hoped for with triple
armatures
- Awkward/ugly cabling
Ultimate Ears super.fi 5 pro
the good
- Lots of bass (though not with much definition)
- Fantastic sound for $190 (via HeadRoom)
the bad
- Lacking treble
- L/R poorly marked
- They protrude pretty far out of the ears,
making me nervous about what could happen if they
get bumped
Etymotic Research ER-4
the good
- Incredible definition without brittle treble
the bad
- Not producing much below 100 Hz
- Seemed to want to be inserted farther into my
ear than anything has a right to go
- Hard to drive with an iPod, but OK with the
Edirol
Sleek Audio SA6 (with neutral treble filter and bass port)
the good
- Most balanced sound so far; good bass, good
definition, no treble harshness
- Fantastic cabling
- Sounds great on the iPod and iPhone
- Included storage case based on Sony's excellent
Fontopia winding cases (since the early '90s)
the bad
- L/R poorly marked
- Storage case fails to be good in any of the
ways the Fontopia cases are
-`._-`._-`._-`._-`._-`._-`._-`._-`._-`._-`._-`._-`._-`._-`._-`._-
clumma@gmail.com